Level 1 Case StudyAndroid / Dec 2021
SoundScape - Android Music Streaming App
I built an end-to-end Android music streaming app with API integration and intelligent caching that reduced API calls by 70%.
70% API call reductionFull music streaming feature set implemented
01
TL;DR
- I built an end-to-end Android music streaming app with API integration and intelligent caching that reduced API calls by 70%.
- Best published result: 70% API call reduction
02
Problem
- Create a functional music streaming experience on Android Music listeners on Android devices. Demonstrates full-stack mobile development and real-world performance optimization.
03
My Role
- personal build with end-to-end ownership
- Problem framing: Create a functional music streaming experience on Android
- Architecture: Android SDK with REST API integration
- Implementation: Room database for caching, MediaPlayer for playback
- Evaluation: 70% API call reduction; Full music streaming feature set implemented
- Before: Demonstrates full-stack mobile development and real-world performance optimization
- Personally designed: Implemented Room caching layer for Musixmatch API responses because Reduces API calls by 70% and improves user experience with instant data; Microservices architecture for playback/notifications because Separates concerns, makes each component independently testable
- Others owned: No separate collaborator-owned subsystem is published in the source data.
04
Constraints
- Built Dec 2021 (personal). Android platform limitations, API rate limits.
05
Architecture
- Input: User search/browse queries, playback controls
- Backend: Android SDK with REST API integration
- Data & storage: Room database for caching, MediaPlayer for playback
- External APIs: Musixmatch API for music metadata
- Output: Music streaming player with search, playlist, and playback controls
Android SDK with REST API integration; Room database for caching, MediaPlayer for playback; Music streaming player with search, playlist, and playback controls
- input 01Input
User search/browse queries, playback controls
- process 02Backendinput ->
Android SDK with REST API integration
- storage 03Data / storagebackend ->
Room database for caching, MediaPlayer for playback
- external 04External APIsbackend ->
Musixmatch API for music metadata
- output 05Outputstorage ->external ->
Music streaming player with search, playlist, and playback controls
Routes
- Input -> Backend
- Backend -> Data / storage
- Backend -> External APIs
- Data / storage -> Output
- External APIs -> Output
06
Key Technical Decisions
- Implemented Room caching layer for Musixmatch API responses
- Microservices architecture for playback/notifications
07
Implementation
- Input layer: User search/browse queries, playback controls
- Core system: Android SDK with REST API integration
- Data layer: Room database for caching, MediaPlayer for playback
- External boundary: Musixmatch API for music metadata
- User output: Music streaming player with search, playlist, and playback controls
08
What Broke / What Didn't Work
- Rejected: No caching, direct API calls (slower, hits rate limits). Chosen path: Implemented Room caching layer for Musixmatch API responses.
- Rejected: Monolithic activity-based approach. Chosen path: Microservices architecture for playback/notifications.
- Caching adds storage requirements but dramatically improves performance
- Microservices add complexity but improve maintainability
09
Results
- 70% API call reduction - Fewer requests to Musixmatch due to caching - Fewer requests to Musixmatch due to caching - resume.json
- Full music streaming feature set implemented - Playback, search, notifications, file operations - Playback, search, notifications, file operations - resume.json
10
What I'd Change Now
- Add offline download capability
- Implement user accounts and sync
- Support additional music sources beyond Musixmatch
11
Stack
- Android SDK
- Java
- REST APIs
- Musixmatch API
- Room database
- MediaPlayer
- Gradle
- Git
12
Links
- Source docs: 2-projects.json
Deep dive prompts
Ask me about the trade-offs.
- Why this architecture boundary exists: Android SDK with REST API integration
- How I evaluated Fewer requests to Musixmatch due to caching
- The hardest tradeoff: Caching adds storage requirements but dramatically improves performance
- What I would change next: Add offline download capability